Today Californians face increased risks from flooding, water
shortages, unhealthy water quality, ecosystem decline and
infrastructure degradation. Many federal and state legislative
acts address ways to improve water resource management, ecosystem
restoration, as well as water rights settlements and strategies
to oversee groundwater and surface water.
House Republicans added a provision to their sweeping tax cut
package authorizing sales of hundreds of thousands of acres of
public lands in Nevada and Utah, prompting outrage from
Democrats and environmentalists who called it a betrayal that
could lead to drilling, mining and logging in sensitive areas.
Republicans on the House Natural Resources Committee adopted
the land sales proposal early Wednesday morning. The initial
draft had not included it amid bipartisan opposition. The land
sale provision was put forward by Republican Reps. Mark Amodei
of Nevada and Celeste Maloy of Utah. The parcels could be used
for economic development, mining and infrastructure projects
such as the expansion of an airport and a
reservoir in Utah, according to local
officials and plans for the areas.
Interior Department employees are preparing for notices of
layoffs as soon as next week, as the Trump administration
appears to ready further cuts at bureaus and agencies that have
already seen hundreds of employees voluntarily leave their
posts. Interior indicated in mid-April that it would pursue
staff reductions — continuing efforts initiated by the
so-called Department of Government Efficiency to slash
executive branch agencies — when it issued staffers a list of
“competitive areas” that could be subject to cuts.
… Interior declined to detail how many of its employees
— which numbered more than 69,000 individuals in September 2024
— have already accepted early retirement offers or enrolled in
the “deferred resignation program.” But according to
individuals with knowledge of reductions at
the Bureau of Reclamation, for example,
reductions have reached as many as 25 percent of the agency, or
1,400 people.
Tulare County Board of Supervisors made its annual trip to
Sacramento to advocate for issues important to the county. The
two days of meetings were held on April 22-23, immediately
before the 2025 California State Association of Counties
Legislative Conference. … “We talked to everybody about
kind of the same issues,” (Supervisor Larry) Micari said,
explaining that the main focus of the advocating effort was
water. “The biggest thing that we talked about is the
Airborne Snow Observatories,” he said. … “There’s talk
of them reducing funding, so we spoke to them to try to get
that funding to stay, and to actually increase it,” he
said.
A proposal by the Trump administration to reorganize the
Environmental Protection Agency targets divisions that house
its climate change offices as well as Energy Star, a widely
popular program designed to help lower energy costs for
American households. A chart of the proposed reorganization
reviewed by The Times on Tuesday showed plans for vast changes
to the Office of Air and Radiation, where the programs are
currently held, among several other divisions. … And
yet, perhaps the most dramatic cuts may be to the agency’s main
office devoted to understanding, tracking and combating climate
change, which is housed under the same division set for a
shuffle.
Berkeley resident Daniel Fahey, recently hired by the
Environmental Protection Agency to administer Bay Area grants
aimed at improving water quality and restoring wetlands, is
among the thousands of so-called “probationary” federal workers
who received an email in mid-February announcing they’d been
fired. … The full impacts of the cuts are yet to be
seen. Already, the EPA has suspended anticipated grants for
North Richmond, putting $19 million in projects meant to
improve the environment in limbo. More than 60 California
grants are on a list of 400 that the EPA has targeted for
termination, according to a list obtained by the San Francisco
Chronicle.
Interior Department veteran Andrea Travnicek on Wednesday
identified Colorado River policies, critical minerals
development and infrastructure as her top three priorities if
she is confirmed as Interior’s assistant secretary for water
and science. With a background that includes service in the
first Trump administration’s Interior Department and leadership
of North Dakota’s Department of Water Resources, Travnicek
noted that there are “a lot of discussions right now” related
to the 1,450-mile river and the allocation of its water. “We’ve
got some looming deadlines that are in front of us next year,
so we’re going to have to work really closely with those seven
states in the [Colorado River] basin,” Travnicek told the
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
A bill requiring the State Water Quality Control Board or
regional water quality control board to describe and consider
the impact on tribes of proposed water projects subject to
their approval was approved (Wednesday) by the Assembly
Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials.
Assemblymember James C. Ramos (D-San Bernardino) introduced the
bill, AB 362, that also requires the state and local boards to
adopt, when applicable, water quality standards to protect
reasonable protections of tribal water uses. … In
managing water quality and access, the State Water Board
designates certain uses such as recreation, navigation, and
preservation and protection of aquatic resources and wildlife
as beneficial uses of water that are defined in the California
Code of Regulations.
The Environmental Protection Agency plans to cancel a total of
781 grants issued under President Joe Biden, EPA lawyers wrote
in a little-noticed court filing last week, almost twice the
number previously reported. The filing in Woonasquatucket
River Watershed Council v. Department of Agriculture marks the
first time the agency has publicly acknowledged the total
number of grants set for termination, which includes all of its
environmental justice grants. It comes during court fights over
whether the EPA has violated its legal obligations when clawing
back the funds. … The canceled grants would have funded
a range of projects aimed at helping communities cope with the
worsening effects of climate change.
Employees at the Environmental Protection Agency got another
nudge toward the door in an email offering a second chance at
voluntary retirement or deferred resignation. The agency
is encouraging thousands of workers who remain after
several rounds of buyouts and layoffs to voluntarily leave the
agency, according to an April 28 email received by USA TODAY.
The ongoing staff reductions are part of a sweeping effort by
President Donald Trump’s administration to slash the size of
the federal work force and reduce federal spending and the
federal deficit. … The two departure programs are being
offered to most employees, with some exclusions, according to
the April 28 notice.
… Proposition 4’s $10 billion bond (was) approved by
California voters in November 2024 to fund climate adaptation
work across the state. … But as Trump has cut or threatened
federal climate funding, “everyone is hoping to get Prop 4
money,” says Robert Mazurek, the executive director of the
California Marine Sanctuaries Foundation. Under
Proposition 4, more than 30 state agencies (many under
the umbrella of the California Natural Resources Agency)
will give out bond money to grantees across the state for
projects that help foster more resilient water systems, less
fiery forests, more biodiverse landscapes, safer coastlines,
cleaner air, and more. Most of those applications for grants
haven’t opened yet—but many groups are already eyeing it.
Here’s Bay Nature’s guide to help organizations understand and
prep for Prop 4’s rollout.
… In an order issued Thursday, (Interior Secretary Doug)
Burgum put Tyler Hassen, who came to the Interior Department as
a representative of the U.S. DOGE Service, in charge of a
sweeping effort to “create significant efficiencies” and
eliminate “redundant efforts” across the department. Hassen’s
broad portfolio includes IT, human resources, training,
financial management, international affairs, contracting,
communications and other tasks. … Hassen’s decisions
could have major implications for how Interior — which is
responsible for maintaining national parks, protecting
endangered species, and overseeing drilling in public lands and
waters — operates going forward. … One
of Hassen’s first tasks after President Donald Trump’s
inauguration was visiting a Northern California water pumping
station to push one of Trump’s long-standing priorities:
rerouting water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to other
parts of the state.
In a major twist, the Donald Trump administration is now
reviewing regional appeals to halt PG&E’s plans to
dismantle the Potter Valley Project. … In an April
14 letter, the Bureau of Reclamation responded to an inquiry
from Aaron Sykes, a board member of the Lake Pillsbury
Alliance, which represents the homeowners and stakeholders
fighting to keep Scott Dam, the structure that holds back Lake
Pillsbury. In the letter, which was reviewed by SFGATE, the
federal agency said funding for the project is “undergoing
reviews” to ensure it aligns with an executive order President
Donald Trump signed on his first day in office that directs the
government to explore any “undue burden” on the “use of
domestic energy resources” including, oil, coal and hydropower.
California farmer Aubrey Bettencourt has been appointed as the
Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS). Bettencourt previously served as the President and
CEO of the Almond Alliance and was the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for the U.S. Department of the Interior during
President Donald Trump’s first administration. … Along
with her roles with the Almond Alliance and the USDA,
Bettencourt comes to the NRCS after working as the Global
Director of Government Relations and External Affairs for
Netafilm, which is an Orbia company.
The proposal advanced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
National Marine Fisheries Service would limit the meaning to
taking direct action to kill or injure endangered or threatened
wildlife — removing the prohibition against habitat destruction
that leads to those ends. It fits with White House officials’
intent to spur economic growth by slashing regulations. If
adopted, the change could significantly curtail the reach of
the Endangered Species Act, passed in 1973 under former
President Nixon. It would also flout a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court
ruling that upheld the definition of harm to encompass
“significant habitat modification or degradation.” …
(T)he previous definition prevented acts like cutting down
swaths of old-growth forests in Northern California and the
Pacific Northwest where federally threatened northern spotted
owls nest and roost. Or filling in a wetland inhabited by
red-legged frogs, California’s state amphibian also listed as
federally threatened.
The Trump administration has proposed nearly $1.7 billion in
cuts to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
that, if passed by Congress, could decimate funding to critical
climate and extreme weather research and fundamentally change
the structure of the agency. The proposal would cut more than
$480 million from NOAA’s Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric
Research, according to a White House document obtained by the
Chronicle. … The proposed budget would eliminate
funding for NOAA’s six regional climate centers, which provide
and manage unique environmental data to different parts of the
United States based on regionally-specific weather and climate
hazards. The Western Regional Climate Center
monitors and researches drought,
precipitation, wildfire smoke and other natural
hazards in California and eight other states.
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that EPA, the Interior and Energy
Departments and other agencies unlawfully froze funds under
Democrats’ climate and infrastructure spending laws, ordering
the agencies to immediately resume disbursing the money. The
ruling from Judge Mary McElroy of the U.S. District Court for
the District of Rhode Island, who was named to the bench by
President Donald Trump in 2019, comes on the eve of an expected
decision from another judge in Washington on whether EPA
lawfully terminated $20 billion in climate grants. That case
and other litigation are part of a complex web of lawsuits over
frozen funds and terminated grants playing out in multiple
courts.
Budget and staffing cuts under President Donald Trump’s
administration are undermining global efforts to monitor the
climate and produce accurate weather forecasts, warns the
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The
quality and quantity of climate observations available to
scientists worldwide supplied by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has already suffered a
measurable decline, according to ECMWF Director General
Florence Rabier. … Rabier said there has been a reduction in
the number of observations shared by the U.S. since March,
including a roughly 10 percent decline from weather balloons
that collect data on temperature, humidity, and wind patterns.
Ben Harris, senior staff attorney with the LA Waterkeeper,
discusses Assembly Bill 1313, which was introduced by assembly
member Diane Papan on March 25. The bill would enact a
statewide commercial stormwater permit in
California that will balance the cost of stormwater management
between private facilities and local governments while
encouraging stormwater capture through the development of more
green space in urban communities. Harris expands on the
purpose of the bill, why LA Waterkeeper sees it as necesssary
and other details.
Letters went out to hundreds of workers at the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) on Thursday, informing
them their jobs had been terminated – again. The probationary
employees, many who performed important roles at the US’s
pre-eminent climate research agency, have spent weeks in limbo
after being dismissed in late February, only to be rehired and
put on administrative leave in mid-March following a federal
court order. … These firings are already hampering the
agency’s ability to provide essential climate and weather
intelligence. Noaa is also bracing for more cuts as leaders
make moves to comply with Trump’s “reduction in force”, an
order that could cull 1,029 more positions.
In an emergency directive issued late last week, U.S.
Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced
her department’s plan to expand logging and timber production
by 25 percent and, in the process, dismantle the
half-a-century-old environmental review system that has blocked
the federal government from finalizing major decisions
concerning national forest lands without public insight. …
While it may seem intuitive that cutting down high-risk trees
will lead to less organic material that could incinerate,
environmentalists say the administration’s plans to increase
timber outputs, simplify permitting, and do away with certain
environmental review processes are likely to only escalate
wildfire risk and contribute more to climate change.
The Trump administration this week ramped up its efforts to
erode nationwide climate progress with a sweeping executive
order aimed at undermining states’ ability to set their own
environmental policies, including key components of
California’s fight against climate change. In an order dated
April 8, the president directed Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi to
identify and “stop the enforcement of” state laws that address
climate change and other environmental initiatives.
… The order also takes aim at California’s cap-and-trade
program — a first-of-its-kind initiative that sets limits on
companies’ greenhouse gas emissions and allows them to sell
“credits” for unused emissions to other companies.
For decades, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has
governed how projects done by federal agencies must assess
their impacts, and how the public is informed about these
projects. But how does this legislation actually work in
practice? And what changes are coming down the pike from the
Trump administration? … “What does it look like to manage
the Colorado River after 2026 when our current operating
guidelines expire? And what will the impacts be to farmers, to
municipalities, to wildlife habitat, to recreation or changing,
potentially, how we allocate water and manage water in the
Colorado River?” he (Chris Winter, the director of the Getches
Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the
Environment at CU Boulder’s School of Law) said. “So that whole
entire process of how people and the public engage in that
conversation and submit their views to the government on what
the government should do, that whole process is governed by the
National Environmental Policy Act.”
Sen. Ben Allen accepted amendments Wednesday to narrow the
scope of his bill meant to protect state waters from Trump
administration rollbacks. What happened: The Senate
Environmental Quality Committee said it would approve SB 601—
which would create the term “nexus waters” to encompass all
waters of the state that were under federal jurisdiction before
the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA — after
Allen agreed to amend it to clarify that it doesn’t apply to
agricultural runoff or drinking water. “We are taking
amendments to be very clear that we’re only talking about point
sources, not non-point source,” said Sean Bothwell, executive
director at California Coastkeeper Alliance and author of the
bill.
A Navy admiral, a lawyer, a fisherman, an environmental group
leader and a former head of the American Meteorological Society
excoriated the Trump administration Wednesday for what they
called a dangerous gutting of NOAA, the nation’s climate,
weather and oceans agency. In a forum hosted by Democratic
members of the House Natural Resources Committee, panelists
representing a broad cross-section of experts and groups cast a
grim picture of a core science agency hollowed out by firings
and budget cuts. “I have hesitated to say this in prior
instances in my life, but lives are at risk, people will die
from this, I’m sorry to say,” Mary Glackin, the former AMS
president and senior vice president of the Weather Company,
told attendees of the hearing led by Rep. Seth Magaziner of
Rhode Island.
A $20 million grant meant to strengthen a Nevada tribe’s poor
access to electric power and clean water has been suspended,
delaying construction timelines. The Environmental Protection
Agency awarded the money to the Nevada Clean Energy
Fund in December — one of 84 projects in that round of
so-called Community Change Grants. With the money, the
nonprofit aimed to work with the Walker River Paiute Tribe in
west-central Nevada on needed infrastructure improvements.
Kristen Stasio, the nonprofit’s CEO, said in an interview last
week that the EPA hasn’t been communicative since she received
notice March 7 that the grant was suspended.
Other federal water and weather project funding news:
Cities across California and the Southwest are significantly
increasing and diversifying their use of recycled wastewater as
traditional water supplies grow tighter.
The 5th edition of our Layperson’s Guide to Water Recycling
covers the latest trends and statistics on water reuse as a
strategic defense against prolonged drought and climate change.
Seeking to prevent the California State Water Resources Control
Board from stepping in to regulate groundwater in critically
overdrafted subbasins, local agencies are working to correct
deficiencies in their plans to protect groundwater. With
groundwater sustainability agencies formed and groundwater
sustainability plans evaluated, the state water board has moved
to implement the 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act,
or SGMA. … Under probation, groundwater extractors in
the Tulare Lake subbasin face annual fees of $300 per well and
$20 per acre-foot pumped, plus a late reporting fee of 25%.
SGMA also requires well owners to file annual groundwater
extraction reports.
California has unveiled an ambitious plan to help combat the
worsening climate crisis with one of its invaluable assets: its
land. Over the next 20 years, the state will work to transform
more than half of its 100 million acres into multi-benefit
landscapes that can absorb more carbon than they release,
officials announced Monday. … The plan also calls for
11.9 million acres of forestland to be managed for biodiversity
protection, carbon storage and water supply protection by 2045,
and 2.7 million acres of shrublands and chaparral to be managed
for carbon storage, resilience and habitat connectivity, among
other efforts.
Today, Congresswoman Norma Torres and Congressman David Valadao
– members of the House Appropriations Committee – announced the
introduction of the bipartisan Removing Nitrate and Arsenic in
Drinking Water Act. This bill would amend the Safe Drinking
Water Act to provide grants for nitrate and arsenic reduction,
by providing $15 million for FY25 and every fiscal year
thereafter. The bill also directs the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to take into consideration the needs of
economically disadvantaged populations impacted by drinking
water contamination. The California State Water Resources
Control Board found the Inland Empire to have the highest
levels of contamination of nitrate throughout the state
including 82 sources in San Bernardino, 67 sources in Riverside
County, and 123 sources in Los Angeles County.
A much-anticipated water bill brought by one of the most
powerful lawmakers on Capitol Hill became public Thursday.
Senate President Stuart Adams’s SB 211, titled “Generational
Water Infrastructure Amendments,” seeks to secure a water
supply for decades to come. It forms a new council comprised of
leadership from the state’s biggest water districts that will
figure out Utah’s water needs for the next 50 to 75 years. It
also creates a new governor-appointed “Utah Water Agent” with a
$1 million annual budget that will “coordinate with the council
to ensure Utah’s generational water needs are met,” according
to a news release. But combing through the text of the bill
reveals the water agent’s main job will be finding an
out-of-state water supply. … The bill also notes the
water agent won’t meddle with existing water compacts with
other states on the Bear and Colorado rivers.
Last week, Assemblywoman Esmeralda Soria introduced AB 2060 to
help divert local floodwater into regional groundwater
basins. AB 2060 seeks to streamline the permitting process
to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in support of
Flood-MAR activities when a stream or river has reached
flood-monitor or flood stage as determined by the California
Nevada River Forecast Center or the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB). This expedited approval process would be
temporary during storm events with qualifying flows under the
SWRCB permit.
… In California, just figuring out who holds a water right
requires a trip to a downtown Sacramento storage room crammed
with millions of paper and microfilmed records dating to the
mid-1800s. Even the state’s water rights enforcers struggle to
determine who is using what. … Come next year, however,
the board expects to have all records electronically accessible
to the public. Officials recently started scanning records tied
to an estimated 45,000 water rights into an online database.
They’re also designing a system that will give real-time data
on how much water is being diverted from rivers and streams
across the state. … Proponents say the information
technology upgrade will help the state and water users better
manage droughts, establish robust water trading markets and
ensure water for fish and the environment.
… Without more investment and regulatory relief,
Californians face a future of chronic water scarcity. Our
system of water storage and distribution is in trouble. We have
depleted aquifers, nearly empty reservoirs on the Colorado
River, and a precarious network of century-old levees that are
one big earthquake away from catastrophic failure. Then there’s
always the next severe drought. Even if the governor
aggressively pushes for more investment in water supply
infrastructure and more regulatory relief so projects can go
forward, the state is again staring down a budget deficit.
Bonds to fund water infrastructure projects are going to have a
hard time getting approval from voters already overburdened
with among the highest taxes in America. - Written by Edward Ring, senior fellow with the
California Policy Center.
Below-average precipitation and snowpack during 2020-22 and
depleted surface and groundwater supplies pushed California
into a drought emergency that brought curtailment orders and
calls for modernizing water rights. At the Water Education
Foundation annual water summit last week in Sacramento,
Eric Oppenheimer, chief deputy director of the California State
Water Resources Control Board, discussed what he described as
the state’s “antiquated” water rights system. He spoke before
some 150 water managers, government officials, farmers,
environmentalists and others as part of the event where
interests come together to collaborate on some of the state’s
most challenging water issues.
This tour traveled along the San Joaquin River to learn firsthand
about one of the nation’s largest and most expensive river
restoration projects.
The San Joaquin River was the focus of one of the most
contentious legal battles in California water history,
ending in a 2006 settlement between the federal government,
Friant Water Users Authority and a coalition of environmental
groups.
Hampton Inn & Suites Fresno
327 E Fir Ave
Fresno, CA 93720
Martha Guzman recalls those awful
days working on water and other issues as a deputy legislative
secretary for then-Gov. Jerry Brown. California was mired in a
recession and the state’s finances were deep in the red. Parks
were cut, schools were cut, programs were cut to try to balance a
troubled state budget in what she remembers as “that terrible
time.”
She now finds herself in a strikingly different position: As
administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
Region 9, she has a mandate to address water challenges across
California, Nevada, Arizona and Hawaii and $1 billion to help pay
for it. It is the kind of funding, she said, that is usually
spread out over a decade. Guzman called it the “absolutely
greatest opportunity.”
Groundwater provides about 40
percent of the water in California for urban, rural and
agricultural needs in typical years, and as much as 60 percent in
dry years when surface water supplies are low. But in many areas
of the state, groundwater is being extracted faster than it can
be replenished through natural or artificial means.
The bill is coming due, literally,
to protect and restore groundwater in California.
Local agencies in the most depleted groundwater basins in
California spent months putting together plans to show how they
will achieve balance in about 20 years.
California is chock full of rivers and creeks, yet the state’s network of stream gauges has significant gaps that limit real-time tracking of how much water is flowing downstream, information that is vital for flood protection, forecasting water supplies and knowing what the future might bring.
That network of stream gauges got a big boost Sept. 30 with the signing of SB 19. Authored by Sen. Bill Dodd (D-Napa), the law requires the state to develop a stream gauge deployment plan, focusing on reactivating existing gauges that have been offline for lack of funding and other reasons. Nearly half of California’s stream gauges are dormant.
Bruce Babbitt, the former Arizona
governor and secretary of the Interior, has been a thoughtful,
provocative and sometimes forceful voice in some of the most
high-profile water conflicts over the last 40 years, including
groundwater management in Arizona and the reduction of
California’s take of the Colorado River. In 2016, former
California Gov. Jerry Brown named Babbitt as a special adviser to
work on matters relating to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and
the Delta tunnels plan.
Groundwater helped make Kern County
the king of California agricultural production, with a $7 billion
annual array of crops that help feed the nation. That success has
come at a price, however. Decades of unchecked groundwater
pumping in the county and elsewhere across the state have left
some aquifers severely depleted. Now, the county’s water managers
have less than a year left to devise a plan that manages and
protects groundwater for the long term, yet ensures that Kern
County’s economy can continue to thrive, even with less water.
Low-income Californians can get help with their phone bills, their natural gas bills and their electric bills. But there’s only limited help available when it comes to water bills.
That could change if the recommendations of a new report are implemented into law. Drafted by the State Water Resources Control Board, the report outlines the possible components of a program to assist low-income households facing rising water bills.
There’s going to be a new governor
in California next year – and a host of challenges both old and
new involving the state’s most vital natural resource, water.
So what should be the next governor’s water priorities?
That was one of the questions put to more than 150 participants
during a wrap-up session at the end of the Water Education
Foundation’s Sept. 20 Water Summit in Sacramento.
Spurred by drought and a major
policy shift, groundwater management has assumed an unprecedented
mantle of importance in California. Local agencies in the
hardest-hit areas of groundwater depletion are drawing plans to
halt overdraft and bring stressed aquifers to the road of
recovery.
Along the way, an army of experts has been enlisted to help
characterize the extent of the problem and how the Sustainable
Groundwater Management Act of 2014 is implemented in a manner
that reflects its original intent.
California voters may experience a sense of déjà vu this year when they are asked twice in the same year to consider water bonds — one in June, the other headed to the November ballot.
Both tackle a variety of water issues, from helping disadvantaged communities get clean drinking water to making flood management improvements. But they avoid more controversial proposals, such as new surface storage, and they propose to do some very different things to appeal to different constituencies.
Participants of this tour snaked along the San Joaquin River to
learn firsthand about one of the nation’s largest and most
expensive river restoration projects.
The San Joaquin River was the focus of one of the most
contentious legal battles in California water history,
ending in a 2006 settlement between the federal government,
Friant Water Users Authority and a coalition of environmental
groups.
A new era of groundwater management
began in 2014 with the passage of the Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act (SGMA), which aims for local and regional agencies
to develop and implement sustainable groundwater management
plans with the state as the backstop.
SGMA defines “sustainable groundwater management” as the
“management and use of groundwater in a manner that can be
maintained during the planning and implementation horizon without
causing undesirable results.”
This handbook provides crucial
background information on the Sustainable Groundwater Management
Act, signed into law in 2014 by Gov. Jerry Brown. The handbook
also includes a section on options for new governance.
Water conservation has become a way of life throughout the West
with a growing recognition that water supply is not unlimited.
Drought is the most common motivator of increased water
conservation. However, the gradual drying of the West due to
climate change means the amount of fresh water available for
drinking, irrigation, industry and other uses must be used as
efficiently as possible.
As part of the historic Colorado
River Delta, the Salton Sea regularly filled and dried for
thousands of years due to its elevation of 237 feet below
sea level.
The most recent version of the Salton Sea was formed in 1905 when
the Colorado River broke
through a series of dikes and flooded the seabed for two years,
creating California’s largest inland body of water. The
Salton Sea, which is saltier than the Pacific Ocean, includes 130
miles of shoreline and is larger than Lake Tahoe.
The federal Safe Drinking Water Act sets standards for drinking
water quality in the United States.
Launched in 1974 and administered by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, the Safe Drinking Water Act oversees states,
communities, and water suppliers who implement the drinking water
standards at the local level.
The act’s regulations apply to every public water system in the
United States but do not include private wells serving less than
25 people.
According to the EPA, there are more than 160,000 public water
systems in the United States.
The California Environmental Quality
Act, commonly known as CEQA, is foundational to the state’s
environmental protection efforts. The law requires proposed
developments with the potential for “significant” impacts on the
physical environment to undergo an environmental review.
Since its passage in 1970, CEQA (based on the National
Environmental Policy Act) has served as a model for
similar legislation in other states.
This printed issue of Western Water looks at some of
the pieces of the 2009 water legislation, including the Delta
Stewardship Council, the new requirements for groundwater
monitoring and the proposed water bond.
This printed issue of Western Water looks at California
groundwater and whether its sustainability can be assured by
local, regional and state management. For more background
information on groundwater please refer to the Foundation’s
Layperson’s Guide to Groundwater.
This printed issue of Western Water looks at hydraulic
fracturing, or “fracking,” in California. Much of the information
in the article was presented at a conference hosted by the
Groundwater Resources Association of California.
This issue of Western Water looks at the political
landscape in Washington, D.C., and Sacramento as it relates to
water issues in 2007. Several issues are under consideration,
including the means to deal with impending climate change, the
fate of the San Joaquin River, the prospects for new surface
storage in California and the Delta.
This printed issue of Western Water examines water
infrastructure – its costs and the quest to augment traditional
brick-and-mortar facilities with sleeker, “green” features.
This printed issue of Western Water examines the
financing of water infrastructure, both at the local level and
from the statewide perspective, and some of the factors that
influence how people receive their water, the price they pay for
it and how much they might have to pay in the future.
This printed issue of Western Water looks at the energy
requirements associated with water use and the means by which
state and local agencies are working to increase their knowledge
and improve the management of both resources.
This printed issue of Western Water discusses low
impact development and stormwater capture – two areas of emerging
interest that are viewed as important components of California’s
future water supply and management scenario.
This printed issue of Western Water examines the
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study and what its
finding might mean for the future of the lifeblood of the
Southwest.
20-minute version of the 2012 documentary The Klamath Basin: A
Restoration for the Ages. This DVD is ideal for showing at
community forums and speaking engagements to help the public
understand the complex issues related to complex water management
disputes in the Klamath River Basin. Narrated by actress Frances
Fisher.
For over a century, the Klamath River Basin along the Oregon and
California border has faced complex water management disputes. As
relayed in this 2012, 60-minute public television documentary
narrated by actress Frances Fisher, the water interests range
from the Tribes near the river, to energy producer PacifiCorp,
farmers, municipalities, commercial fishermen, environmentalists
– all bearing legitimate arguments for how to manage the water.
After years of fighting, a groundbreaking compromise may soon
settle the battles with two epic agreements that hold the promise
of peace and fish for the watershed. View an excerpt from the
documentary here.
30-minute DVD that traces the history of the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation and its role in the development of the West. Includes
extensive historic footage of farming and the construction of
dams and other water projects, and discusses historic and modern
day issues.
This beautiful 24×36 inch poster, suitable for framing, features
a map of the San Joaquin River. The map text focuses on the San
Joaquin River Restoration Program, which aims to restore flows
and populations of Chinook salmon to the river below Friant Dam
to its confluence with the Merced River. The text discusses the
history of the program, its goals and ongoing challenges with
implementation.
A companion to the Truckee River Basin Map poster, this
24×36-inch poster, suitable for framing, explores the Carson
River, and its link to the Truckee River. The map includes the
Lahontan Dam and reservoir, the Carson Sink, and the farming
areas in the basin. Map text discusses the region’s hydrology and
geography, the Newlands Project, land and water use within the
basin and wetlands. Development of the map was funded by a grant
from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region, Lahontan
Basin Area Office.
The 28-page Layperson’s Guide to Water Rights Law, recognized as
the most thorough explanation of California water rights law
available to non-lawyers, traces the authority for water flowing
in a stream or reservoir, from a faucet or into an irrigation
ditch through the complex web of California water rights.
The 20-page Layperson’s Guide to Water Marketing provides
background information on water rights, types of transfers and
critical policy issues surrounding this topic. First published in
1996, the 2005 version offers expanded information on
groundwater banking and conjunctive use, Colorado River
transfers and the role of private companies in California’s
developing water market.
Order in bulk (25 or more copies of the same guide) for a reduced
fee. Contact the Foundation, 916-444-6240, for details.
The 24-page Layperson’s Guide to the State Water Project provides
an overview of the California-funded and constructed State Water
Project.
The State Water Project is best known for the 444-mile-long
aqueduct that provides water from the Delta to San Joaquin Valley
agriculture and southern California cities. The guide contains
information about the project’s history and facilities.
The Water Education Foundation’s second edition of
the Layperson’s Guide to The Klamath River Basin is
hot off the press and available for purchase.
Updated and redesigned, the easy-to-read overview covers the
history of the region’s tribal, agricultural and environmental
relationships with one of the West’s largest rivers — and a
vast watershed that hosts one of the nation’s oldest and
largest reclamation projects.
The 24-page Layperson’s Guide to Integrated Regional Water
Management (IRWM) is an in-depth, easy-to-understand publication
that provides background information on the principles of IRWM,
its funding history and how it differs from the traditional water
management approach.
The 28-page Layperson’s Guide to Groundwater is an in-depth,
easy-to-understand publication that provides background and
perspective on groundwater. The guide explains what groundwater
is – not an underground network of rivers and lakes! – and the
history of its use in California.
The 24-page Layperson’s Guide to Flood Management explains the
physical flood control system, including levees; discusses
previous flood events (including the 1997 flooding); explores
issues of floodplain management and development; provides an
overview of flood forecasting; and outlines ongoing flood control
projects.
The 24-page Layperson’s Guide to the Central Valley Project
explores the history and development of the federal Central
Valley Project (CVP), California’s largest surface water delivery
system. In addition to the project’s history, the guide describes
the various facilities, operations and benefits the water
project brings to the state along with the CVP
Improvement Act (CVPIA).
The 24-page Layperson’s Guide to the Delta explores the competing
uses and demands on California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
Included in the guide are sections on the history of the Delta,
its role in the state’s water system, and its many complex issues
with sections on water quality, levees, salinity and agricultural
drainage, fish and wildlife, and water distribution.
For more than 30 years, the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta has been embroiled in continuing controversy over the
struggle to restore the faltering ecosystem while maintaining its
role as the hub of the state’s water supply.
Lawsuits and counter lawsuits have been filed, while
environmentalists and water users continue to clash over
the amount of water that can be safely exported from the region.
Passed in 1970, the federal National Environmental Policy Act
requires lead public agencies to prepare and submit for public
review environmental impact reports and statements on major
federal projects under their purview with potentially significant
environmental effects.
According to the Department of Energy, administrator of NEPA:
California has considered, but not implemented, a comprehensive
groundwater strategy many
times over the last century.
One hundred years ago, the California Conservation Commission
considered adding groundwater regulation into the Water
Commission Act of 1913. After hearings were held, it was
decided to leave groundwater rights out of the Water Code.
Federal reserved rights were created when the United States
reserved land from the public domain for uses such as Indian
reservations, military bases and national parks, forests and
monuments. [See also Pueblo Rights].
The federal government passed the Endangered Species Act in 1973,
following earlier legislation. The first, the Endangered
Species Preservation Act of 1966, authorized land acquisition to
conserve select species. The Endangered Species Conservation Act
of 1969 then expanded on the 1966 act, and authorized “the
compilation of a list of animals “threatened with worldwide
extinction” and prohibits their importation without a permit.”
California’s Legislature passed the
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act in 1972, following the passage of the
federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by Congress in 1968. Under
California law, “[c]ertain rivers which possess extraordinary
scenic, recreational, fishery, or wildlife values shall be
preserved in their free-flowing state, together with their
immediate environments, for the benefit and enjoyment of the
people of the state.”
The legal term “area-of-origin” dates back to 1931 in California.
At that time, concerns over water transfers prompted enactment of
four “area-of-origin” statutes. With water transfers from
Yosemite’s Hetch Hetchy Valley to supply water for San Francisco
and from Owens Valley to Los Angeles fresh in mind, the statutes
were intended to protect local areas against export of water.
In particular, counties in Northern California had concerns about
the state tapping their water to develop California’s supply.
It would be a vast understatement to say the package of water
bills approved by the California Legislature and signed by Gov.
Arnold Schwarzenegger last November was anything but a
significant achievement. During a time of fierce partisan battles
and the state’s long-standing political gridlock with virtually
all water policy, pundits at the beginning of 2009 would have
given little chance to lawmakers being able to reach compromise
on water legislation.
This year marks the 30th anniversary of one of the most
significant environmental laws in American history, the Clean
Water Act (CWA). The law that emerged from the consensus and
compromise that characterizes the legislative process has had
remarkable success, reversing years of neglect and outright abuse
of the nation’s waters.
In January, Mary Nichols joined the cabinet of the new Davis
administration. With her appointment by Gov. Gray Davis as
Secretary for Resources, Ms. Nichols, 53, took on the role of
overseeing the state of California’s activities for the
management, preservation and enhancement of its natural
resources, including land, wildlife, water and minerals. As head
of the Resources Agency, she directs the activities of 19
departments, conservancies, boards and commissions, serving as
the governor’s representative on these boards and commissions.
Two days before our annual Executive Briefing, I picked up my
phone to hear “The White House calling… .” Vice President Al
Gore had accepted the foundation’s invitation to speak at our
March 13 briefing on California water issues. That was the start
of a new experience for us. For in addition to conducting a
briefing for about 250 people, we were now dealing with Secret
Service agents, bomb sniffing dogs and government sharpshooters,
speech writers, print and TV reporters, school children and
public relations people.
