Gov. Jerry Brown and legislators are negotiating a new water bond
that would go before voters in November. If negotiations break
down in the next few weeks – and we hope they don’t – voters
would decide on a flawed $11 billion water bond crafted in 2009.
Gov. Jerry Brown’s call for a drastically cheaper water bond set
off a fresh round of negotiations in the Capitol on Wednesday, as
lawmakers and stakeholders seek to craft a plan that addresses
the state’s myriad water needs without a bloated price tag.
From U-T San Diego, in a column by Steven Greenhut:
Few issues are more important to the future of California than
providing a reliable source of water for the state’s growing
population. But despite the sense of urgency caused by this
year’s particularly severe drought, legislators still aren’t sure
exactly what to do about the problem.
Water bond politics look poised to dominate the remainder of
California’s legislative session, with Senate leadership and Gov.
Jerry Brown billions of dollars apart on the size of a revised
water bond for the November 2014 ballot.
Gov. Jerry Brown told legislative leaders Tuesday that he wants a
$6-billion water bond to be put before voters in November — a
substantially lower price tag than proposals making their way
through the Legislature.
The governor told legislative leaders in private meetings Tuesday
that he opposes the existing water bond, which was negotiated by
former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and lawmakers in 2009, and
wants a $6 billion bond instead.
From the Los Angeles Times, in a commentary by Gary
It’s been 40 years since the June 20, 1974, opening of
“Chinatown,” the fictionalized drama about power, corruption and
what is arguably L.A.’s most crucial resource: water. The iconic
film was Hollywood’s make-believe version of an undying reality:
In L.A., you have to follow the water.
From the PPIC Viewpoints blog, in a post by Emma Freeman and
Much of the current water talk in Sacramento surrounds a new
state water bond for the November ballot. Yet as we show in our
study Paying for Water in California, most water spending—84
percent—is actually raised locally.
“Wielding two decades of Senate experience and sheer force of
will, Sen. Dianne Feinstein overcame environmentalists’
objections and Republicans’ skepticism in pushing through a
drought-relief bill that could ship more water to farms and
cities and weaken protections for fish.”
From the Los Angeles Times, in a commentary by Kerry
“The fight over transparency at the Los Angeles Department of
Water and Power is only escalating, with yet another lawsuit
filed this week over two secretive nonprofits that have received
$40 million in ratepayer money.”
“From all over California, farmers, environmental lawyers,
wildlife groups, cities and even the Fresno County sheriff have
posted thoughts in a siege of protests to state officials about
the use of this year’s puny snowpack and half-empty reservoirs.”